Dignity found its way into English through French from Latin before the Renaissance The Renaissance was a cultural movement that spanned roughly the 14th to the 17th century, beginning in Florence in the Late Middle Ages and later spreading to the rest of Europe. The term is also used more loosely to refer to the historic era, but since the changes of the Renaissance were not uniform across Europe, this is a general use of the.[1] At that time, dignity was a quality akin to nobility, majesty, and wonderfulness, and philosophers granted dignity to assorted ideas and to various beings. In the 1700s, Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant (22 April 1724 – 12 February 1804) was an 18th-century German philosopher from the Prussian city of Königsberg. Kant was the last influential philosopher of modern Europe in the classic sequence of the theory of knowledge during the Enlightenment beginning with thinkers John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume said dignity was being granted to too many ideas and beings. He insisted that a human was the only being, and the human capacity for morality was the only idea, that had dignity.

In the twentieth century, dignity appeared in assorted writings (including international proclamations and conventions) as a reason for peacemaking and for promoting human rights. Academics discovered that many people believed dignity was a synonym for humanness. The academics discovered that, for many people, being human means having dignity, and having dignity means being entitled to respect and to human rights. The academics further discovered, however, that people had tacit qualifications attached to their idea of a human being. Because of these qualifications, many people do not grant humanness to every other person. According to the academics, many people hold the view that only some people have dignity, and only some people deserve respect and rights.

Aldergrove and others say that using dignity to justify calls for respect and for rights is illogical. Aldergrove says dignity (as humanness) is no different from other abstractions, for instance, preciousness or "just because". McDougal et al point out that dignity can be used to justify one set of rights, and to justify another set of rights that nullify the first set.

Aldergrove notes that some people use dignity to mean something other than humanness. Aldergrove observes that, when dignity has a meaning other than "humanness," dignity does not become a more logical reason for rights. The difficulty, says Aldergrove, is that no meaning of dignity can overcome the is-ought problem that David Hume David Hume was a Scottish philosopher and historian, regarded as one of the most important figures in the history of Western philosophy and the Scottish Enlightenment. Hume is often grouped with John Locke, George Berkeley, and a handful of others as a British Empiricist identified.

In the twentieth century and thereafter, few people objected to using dignity as a reason for rights. Consequently, dignity became a concern for legislators, jurists, lawyers, human rights defenders, physicians, medical researchers, and ethicists.

Contents

Philosophy

A philosopher of the Renaissance, Pico della Mirandola, granted dignity to ideas and to beings. In his "Oration on the Dignity of Man", he told hostile clerics about the dignity of the liberal arts and about the dignity and the glory of angels Angels are messengers of God in the Hebrew Bible , the New Testament and the Quran. The term "angel" has also been expanded to various notions of "spiritual beings" found in many other religious traditions. Other roles of angels include protecting and guiding human beings. His comments implied the dignity of philosophers.[2]

Woodcut from Cesare Ripa's Cesare Ripa was an Italian aesthetician who worked for Cardinal Anton Maria Salviati as a cook and butler Iconologia depicting the Allegory of Dignity

A philosopher of the Age of Enlightenment The Age of Enlightenment is the era in Western philosophy and intellectual, scientific and cultural life, centered upon the eighteenth century, in which reason was advocated as the primary source and legitimacy for authority (1600s and 1700s), Immanuel Kant said one idea only and one being only had dignity. Kant said those things only which are beyond all value have dignity. Kant identified those things that are beyond all value as ends in themselves. Something is an end in itself if it has morality; that is, if it can make choices between right and wrong. Kant said "morality, and humanity as capable of it, is that which alone has dignity.”[3]

Egonsson calls the belief that equates dignity with being human the Standard Attitude.[4] Wertheimer calls the equating of dignity with humanness the Standard Belief.[5] Egonsson observes that, while some people claim to have the Standard Attitude, they use language which indicates that they have attached qualifications other than humanness to their idea of dignity. Egonsson says some of these qualifications may exclude some people from being human and from having dignity. Wertheimer agrees with Egonsson's observation. Wertheimer says "it is not a definitional truth that human beings have human status."[6]

Aldergrove says dignity, when it is used to mean being human, is a conceit. Having dignity, he contends, is no different from having preciousness or greatness or specialness or glory. Aldergrove says a conceit is "an excuse to feel the way you want, or to do what you want."[7] Aldergrove says a conceit is a way of creating an authority out of nothing. He says a conceit is equal to just because as a reason for anything.[8] He insists dignity as humanness "can be an excuse for any law or policy."[9]

Aldergrove considers alternative meanings for dignity. He notes that some dictionaries define dignity as a quality or state worthy of esteem and respect.[1] He notes that some dictionaries define dignity as stateliness.[1][10][11] After considering meanings for dignity other than humanness, Aldergrove concludes that no meaning is better than humanness as a justification for respect and rights. All the claims to respect and to rights are precluded, says Aldergrove, because of the observation by Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume noted that an is-statement does not give rise logically to just one ought-statement (the is-ought_problem In meta-ethics, the is-ought problem was articulated by David Hume , who noted that many writers make claims about what ought to be, on the basis of statements about what is. However, there seems to be a significant difference between descriptive statements (about what is) and prescriptive or normative statements (about what ought to be)).[12] Thus, says Aldergrove, we cannot go logically from "we are human" (or "we are worthy of esteem" or "we have dignity") to some therefore about what we ought to do or believe with regard to respect or to rights or to any other matter.[13]

Despite its problematic nature, dignity figures prominently among the world's concerns. As the following paragraphs illustrate, dignity is an issue in matters of religion, human rights, medicine, and law.

Religion

The Catechism of the Catholic Church The Catechism of the Catholic Church is an official exposition of the teachings of the Catholic Church. A provisional, "reference text" was issued by Pope John Paul II on October 11, 1992 — "the thirtieth anniversary of the opening of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council" — with his apostolic constitution, Fidei depositum insists the "dignity of the human person is rooted in his or her creation in the image and likeness The Image of God is a concept and theological doctrine that asserts that human beings are created in God's image and therefore have inherent value independent of their utility or function of God God is the English name given to the singular omnipotent being in theistic and deistic religions who is either the sole deity in monotheism, or a single deity in polytheism." "All human beings," says the Church, "in as much as they are created in the image of God, have the dignity of a person." The catechism says, "The right to the exercise of freedom belongs to everyone because it is inseparable from his or her dignity as a human person."[14]

Proclamations and Conventions

Through much of the 20th Century, dignity appeared in assorted writings as a reason for peacemaking and for promoting human rights. For example, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a declaration adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948 at the Palais de Chaillot in Paris. The Declaration has been translated into at least 375 languages and dialects, making it the most widely translated document in the world. The Declaration arose directly from the, adopted by the United Nations The United Nations Organization or simply United Nations (UN) is an international organization whose stated aims are facilitating cooperation in international law, international security, economic development, social progress, human rights, and the achieving of world peace. The UN was founded in 1945 after World War II to replace the League of General Assembly The United Nations General Assembly is one of the five principal organs of the United Nations and the only one in which all member nations have equal representation. Its powers are to oversee the budget of the United Nations, appoint the non-permanent members to the Security Council, receive reports from other parts of the United Nations and make on December 10, 1948, states:

Article 1. All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2. Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Subsequent proclamations also invoke dignity in the call for more rights. For example, the American Convention on Human Rights The American Convention on Human Rights is an international human rights instrument. It was adopted by the nations of the Americas meeting in San José, Costa Rica, in 1969. It came into force after the eleventh instrument of ratification (that of Grenada) was deposited on 18 July 1978 (1969), article 11(1), proclaims, "Everyone has the right to have his honor respected and his dignity recognized." The African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights is an international human rights instrument that is intended to promote and protect human rights and basic freedoms in the African continent (1981), art. 5, insists, "Every individual shall have the right to the respect of the dignity inherent in a human being." All the international proclamations leave dignity undefined.[15]

At the beginning of the 21st Century, dignity was a reason to curtail human rights. Clergy and laity invoked dignity to explain their agreement with resolutions that were being approved by the United Nations. Those resolutions bid all nations to restrict rights by imposing legal sanctions upon blasphemy Blasphemy is irreverence toward holy personages, religious artifacts, customs, and beliefs. The Abrahamic religions condemn blasphemy vehemently. Some countries have laws to punish blasphemy, while others have laws to give recourse to those who are offended by blasphemy. Those laws may discourage blasphemy as a matter of blasphemous libel, (defamation of religion) and upon all conduct that a religious person might find offensive.[16] One archbishop favored legal sanctions because, he said, it is "the manipulation and defamation of religion which threatens human dignity, rights, peace and security."[17] One law professor hoped "the law against defamation of religions may be constructed in a way that does not abridge legitimate speech including artistic freedom and yet protects the dignity of religion."[18] On 26 March 2009, the United Nations Human Rights Council The United Nations Human Rights Council is an inter-governmental body within the United Nations System. The UNHRC is the successor to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR, herein CHR), and is a subsidiary body of the United Nations General Assembly. The council works closely with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights adopted a non-binding resolution that states, "defamation of religions is a serious affront to human dignity leading to a restriction on the freedom of religion of their adherents and incitement to religious hatred and violence."[19]

Medicine

In the 20th century, dignity became an issue for physicians and medical researchers.

International Bodies

In June 1964, the World Medical Association The World Medical Association , an international organization of physicians, was formally established on September 17, 1947, pursuant to the resolutions of the First General Assembly of WMA held in Paris, France. In 2007, the WMA had a membership of 84 national medical associations and represents some 9 million physicians issued the Declaration of Helsinki The Declaration of Helsinki was developed by the World Medical Association , as a set of ethical principles for the medical community regarding human experimentation, and is widely regarded as the cornerstone document of human research ethics. (WMA 2000, Bošnjak 2001, Tyebkhan 2003). The Declaration says at article 11, "It is the duty of physicians who participate in medical research to protect the life, health, dignity, integrity, right to self-determination, privacy, and confidentiality of personal information of research subjects."[20]

The Council of Europe The Council of Europe is one of the oldest international organisations working towards European integration, having been founded in 1949. It has a particular emphasis on legal standards, human rights, democratic development, the rule of law and cultural co-operation. It has 47 member states with some 800 million citizens. It is distinct from the invoked dignity in its effort to govern the progress of biology and medicine. On 4 April 1997, the Council, at Oviedo, approved the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine. The convention's preamble contains these statements, among others:

Conscious of the accelerating developments in biology and medicine;

Convinced of the need to respect the human being both as an individual and as a member of the human species and recognising the importance of ensuring the dignity of the human being;

Conscious that the misuse of biology and medicine may lead to acts endangering human dignity;

Resolving to take such measures as are necessary to safeguard human dignity and the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual with regard to the application of biology and medicine.

The Convention states, "Parties to this Convention shall protect the dignity and identity of all human beings and guarantee everyone, without discrimination, respect for their integrity and other rights and fundamental freedoms with regard to the application of biology and medicine."

In 1998, the United Nations mentioned dignity in the UNESCO Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights. At Article 2, the declaration states, “Everyone has a right to respect for their dignity.” At Article 24, the declaration warns that treating a person to remove a genetic defect "could be contrary to human dignity." The Commentary that accompanies the declaration says that, as a consequence of the possibility of germ-line treatment, "it is the very dignity of the human race which is at stake."

Canada

In 1996, the Government of Canada issued a report entitled New Reproductive and Genetic Technologies. The report used “the principles of respect for human life and dignity” as its reason for recommending that various activities associated with genetic research and human reproduction be prohibited. The report said the prohibited activities were “contrary to Canadian values of equality and respect for human life and dignity.”

[21]

Denmark

The Ministry of Health enacted the ‘‘Danish Council Act 1988’’, which established the Danish Council of Ethics. The Council advises the Ministry on matters of medicine and genetic research on humans. In 2001, the Council condemned "reproductive cloning because it would violate human dignity, because it could have adverse consequences for the cloned person and because permitting research on reproductive cloning would reflect a disregard for the respect due to the moral status of embryos."[22]

France

In 1984, France set up the National Consultative Committee for Ethics in the Life and Health Sciences (CCNE) to advise the government about the regulation of medical practices and research. In 1986, the CCNE said, "Respect for human dignity must guide both the development of knowledge and the limits or rules to be observed by research." The CCNE said that research on human embryos must be subject to "the rule of reason" and must have regard for "undefined dignity in its practical consequences."[23] The CCNE insisted that, in research on human embryos, the ethical principles that should apply are "respecting human dignity" and respecting "the dignity of science."[23]

Portugal

The National Council of Ethics of Portugal published its Opinion on the Ethical Implications of Cloning in 1997. The opinion states, “the cloning of human beings, because of the problems it raises concerning the dignity of the human person, the equilibrium of the human species and life in society, is ethically unacceptable and must be prohibited.”[24]

Sweden

Sweden's The Genetic Integrity Act (2006:351), The Biobanks in Medical Care Act (2002:297), Health and Medical Services (Professional Activities) Act (1998:531), and The Health and Medical Services Act (1982:763) all express concern for "the integrity of the individual" or "human dignity."[25]

Switzerland

The Constitution says Swiss citizens must respect the dignity of animals, plants, and other organisms. Accordingly, the Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology (ECNH) published a brochure in 2008 about how researchers can respect the dignity of plants.[26]

United States

In 2008, The President's Council on Bioethics The President's Council on Bioethics was a group of individuals appointed by United States President George W. Bush to advise his administration on bioethics. Established on November 28, 2001, by Executive Order 13237, the Council was directed to "advise the President on bioethical issues that may emerge as a consequence of advances in tried to arrive at a consensus about what dignity meant but failed. Edmund D. Pellegrino, M.D., the Council's Chairman, says in the Letter of Transmittal to the President of The United States, "… there is no universal agreement on the meaning of the term, human dignity."[27]

Law

McDougal, Lasswell, and Chen studied dignity as a basis for international law.[28] They said that using dignity as the basis for laws was a "natural law Natural law or the law of nature has been described as a law whose content is set by nature and that therefore has validity everywhere. As classically used, natural law refers to the use of reason to analyze human nature and deduce binding rules of moral behavior. The phrase natural law is opposed to the positive law (which is man-made) of a given approach."[29] The natural law approach, they said, depends upon "exercises of faith."[30] McDougal, Lasswell, and Chen observed:[31]

The abiding difficulty with the natural law approach is that its assumptions, intellectual procedures, and modalities of justification can be employed equally by the proponents of human dignity and the proponents of human indignity in support of diametrically opposed empirical specifications of rights . . . .

Canada

In 2004, Canada enacted the Assisted Human Reproduction Act. Section 2(b) of the Act states, "the benefits of assisted human reproductive technologies and related research for individuals, for families and for society in general can be most effectively secured by taking appropriate measures for the protection and promotion of human health, safety, dignity and rights in the use of these technologies and in related research." The Act prescribes a fine not exceeding $500,000 or imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, or both, if someone undertakes a proscribed activity such as the creation of a chimera Typically seen in non-human zoology , a chimera is an animal that has two or more different populations of genetically distinct cells that originated in different zygotes; if the different cells emerged from the same zygote, it is called a mosaicism.

France

In 1997, the National Consultative Committee for Ethics in the Life and Health Sciences, as well as other observers, noted that France's dignity-based laws on bio-medical research were paradoxical. The law prohibited the willful destruction of human embryos but directed that human embryos could be destroyed if they were more than five years old.[32] The law prohibited research on human embryos created in France but permitted research on human embryos brought to France.[32] The law prohibited researchers from creating embryos for research but allowed researchers to experiment with embryos that were superfluous after in vitro fertilization.[33]

Germany

Human dignity is the fundamental principle of the German constitution The Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany is the constitutional law of Germany. It was formally approved on 8 May 1949, and, with the signature of the Allies, came into effect on 23 May 1949, as the constitution of West Germany. Article 1, paragraph 1 reads: "Human dignity shall be inviolable. To respect and protect it shall be the duty of all state authority."[34] Human dignity is thus mentioned even before the right to life Right to life is a phrase that describes the belief that a human being has an essential right to live, particularly that a human being has the right not to be killed by another human being. The concept of a right to life is central to debates on the issues of capital punishment, euthanasia, self defense, abortion and war. This has a significant impact on German law-making and jurisdiction in both serious and trivial items:

Switzerland

The Swiss Constitution states at Article 7, “Human dignity is to be respected and protected.”[36] The Constitution mentions dignity again in relation to medicine and genetics:

Article 119a Transplantation Medicine

(1) The Federation adopts rules in the field of transplantation of organs, tissue, and cells. It provides thereby for the protection of human dignity, personality, and health. (2) The Federation establishes particularly criteria for the just assignment of organs. (3) Donations of human organs, tissue, and cells are free of charge. The trade with human organs is prohibited.

Article 120 Gene Technology in the Non-Human Field (1) Humans and their environment are protected against abuse of gene technology. (2) The Federation adopts rules on the use of reproductive and genetic material of animals, plants, and other organisms. It takes thereby into account the dignity of the creature and the security of man, animal and environment, and protects the genetic multiplicity of animal and plant species.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dignity
  2. ^ http://www.cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/Mirandola/
  3. ^ Kant, Immanuel. "Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals". trans. by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott (Second Section: Transition From Popular Moral Philosophy To The Metaphysic Of Morals). Project Gutenberg. http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/5682. Retrieved 5 February 2010.
  4. ^ Egonsson, Dan (1998). Dimensions of Dignity: The Moral Importance of Being Human. Dordrecht, Sweden: Kluwer Academic. p. 132.
  5. ^ Wertheimer, Roger; R. L. Perkins ed. (1974). "Philosophy on Humanity". Abortion: Pro and Con. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman. pp. 107-28.
  6. ^ Egonsson, pp. 81-82.
  7. ^ Aldergrove, John Romney (2000). Why We Are Not Obsolete Yet: Genetics, Algeny, and the Future. Burnaby: Stentorian. pp. 198. ISBN The International Standard Book Number is a unique numeric commercial book identifier based upon the 9-digit Standard Book Numbering (SBN) code created by Gordon Foster, now Emeritus Professor of Statistics at Trinity College, Dublin, for the booksellers and stationers W.H. Smith and others in 1966 0-9682932-1-2.
  8. ^ Aldergrove, p. 85.
  9. ^ Aldergrove, p. 85.
  10. ^ He mentions Thurber who says dignity pertains only to the exceptional individual. Thurber says dignity "has gleamed only now and then and here and there, in lonely splendor, throughout the ages, a hope of the better men, never an achievement of the majority". Thurber, James (1989), 'Thinking Ourselves Into Trouble,' pt. 3, Collecting Himself: James Thurber on Writing and Writers, Humor and Himself, Michael J. Rosen ed., Harper & Row.
  11. ^ Aldergrove (p. 71) says dignity should mean the set of attributes that distinguish an intelligent, solemn, sober, healthy, independent, adult homo sapiens (the model adult) from someone else, especially a young child or a lunatic.
  12. ^ Hume, David (1739-1740), A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects, Book III (Of Morals), Part I (Of virtue and vice in general), Sect. I (Moral distinctions not deriv'd from reason).
  13. ^ Aldergrove, p. 83.
  14. ^ Compendium of the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
  15. ^ None of the international proclamations suggest dignity is the rare quality that some commentators say it should be. Aldergrove says dignity means the set of attributes that distinguish an intelligent, solemn, sober, healthy, independent, adult homo sapiens (the model adult) from someone else, especially a young child or a lunatic (Aldergrove, 71). Thurber says dignity "has gleamed only now and then and here and there, in lonely splendor, throughout the ages, a hope of the better men, never an achievement of the majority" (James Thurber, 'Thinking Ourselves Into Trouble,' pt. 3, Collecting Himself: James Thurber on Writing and Writers, Humor and Himself, Michael J. Rosen ed. (Harper & Row, 1989)).
  16. ^ G.A. Res. 60/150; U.N. Doc. A/Res/60/150; G.A. Res. 61/164; U.N. Doc. A/Res/61/164; G.A. Res. 62/154; U.N. Doc. A/Res/62/154.
  17. ^ Archbishop Defends Religious Freedom to U.N. Council 2006-07-14.
  18. ^ Khan, Liaquat Ali. 'Combating Defamation of Religions' 1 January 2007.
  19. ^ United Nations Human Rights Council on religious defamation," 26 March 2009 Retrieved 2009-03-30.
  20. ^ Declaration of Helsinki by World Medical Association
  21. ^ Bill in Parliament of Canada 1996
  22. ^ Gratton, Brigitte. Survey on the National Regulations in the European Union regarding Research on Human Embryos (July 2002), 16.
  23. ^ a b CCNE Opinion no. 8.
  24. ^ Gratton, Brigitte. Survey on the National Regulations in the European Union regarding Research on Human Embryos (July 2002), 53.
  25. ^ Swedish statutes.
  26. ^ Dignity of Plants.
  27. ^ Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics March 2008.
  28. ^ Myres S. McDougal, Harold D. Lasswell, and Lung-chu Chen, Human Rights and World Public Order: The Basic Policies of an International Law of Human Dignity (New Haven: Yale UP, 1980).
  29. ^ McDougal et al, note, at 70.
  30. ^ McDougal et al, note, at 69.
  31. ^ McDougal et al, note, at 71.
  32. ^ a b CCNE Opinion no. 053.
  33. ^ Cazeau, Bernard. (French) Senat.fr Retrieved 2009-04-11.
  34. ^ Bundestag.de
  35. ^ German law about abortion.
  36. ^ Swiss Constitution.

External links

Wikiquote Wikiquote is one of a family of wiki-based projects run by the Wikimedia Foundation, running on MediaWiki software. Based on an idea by Daniel Alston and implemented by Brion Vibber, the goal of the project is to produce collaboratively a vast reference of quotations from prominent people, books, films and proverbs, and to give details about them has a collection of quotations related to: Dignity
Human rights Human rights are "rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled." Proponents of the concept usually assert that everyone is endowed with certain entitlements merely by reason of being human
Fundamental concepts and philosophies
Natural and legal rights Legal rights are rights conveyed by a particular polity, codified into legal statutes by some form of legislature (or unenumerated but implied from enumerated rights), and as such are contingent upon local laws, customs, or beliefs · Claim rights and liberty rights Some philosophers and political scientists make a distinction between claim rights and liberty rights. A claim right is a right which entails responsibilities, duties, or obligations on other parties regarding the right-holder. In contrast, a liberty right is a right which does not entail obligations on other parties, but rather only freedom or · Negative and positive rights · Individual rights and Group rights Natural law · Positive law · State sovereignty · Universal jurisdiction

List of Organisations ·

National institutions
International human rights legal instruments · International human rights law · International humanitarian law
Civil and political rights · Economic, social and cultural rights · Reproductive rights
Human rights by continent

Africa · Asia · Europe · North America · Oceania · South America

Categories: Positive mental attitude | Psychological attitude | Constitutional law | Ethics | Human rights | Autonomy

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Views
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages

 

The above information uses material from Wikipedia and is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Some facts may not have been fully verified for accuracy. [Disclaimers]
This page was last archived by our server on Mon Jul 19 14:10:21 2010. [ refresh local cache ]
Displaying this page or its contents does not use any Wikimedia Foundation's resources.
The owners of this site proudly support the Wikimedia Foundation.


Human beings have dignity and every measure has to be clarified
worldculturepictorial.com
Human beings have dignity and every measure has to be clarified
500px x 510px | 205.60kB

[source page]

quote Ben Wallace an ex Army officer former overseas director in the security intelligence division at UK defense firm QinetiQ one of the companies making the full body scanner

Yahoo Images Search: Human dignity,
Mon Jul 26 13:46:32 2010
 Human Dignity and Humiliation Studies Blog Archive Position ...
humiliationstudies.org
Human Dignity and Humiliation Studies Blog Archive Position ...



Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:42:40 GM

Human Dignity. and Humiliation Studies. The 6th Annual Morton Deutsch Awards for Distinguished Contributions to Social ... Website. . Human Dignity. and Humiliation Studies is proudly powered by WordPress Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

Google Blogs Search: Human dignity,
Mon Jul 19 14:10:22 2010
Why did Bush think the expression "no outrages upon human dignity" was vague.?
Q. I think it's because human dignity is something that ethical pygmies find hard to comprehend. But that's just a guess. The Geneva Conventions have not been modified since 1949. Now, 57 years later, our President , who speaks English not so good, wants to change them so even he can understand them. He such an embarrassment!
Asked by phoxee2003 - Tue Oct 10 10:31:40 2006 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments

A. It is because everything Bush says is so specific and easy to understand.
Answered by M BAIT - Tue Oct 10 10:34:06 2006

Yahoo Answers Search: Human dignity,
Mon Jul 26 13:46:45 2010